© 2012 EHM Productions, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
In partnership with TMZ.com | Privacy Policy
© 2012 EHM Productions, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
In partnership with TMZ.com | Privacy Policy
What's Everyone Saying?
1. realy so hot
Posted at 11:26AM on Apr 1st 2012 by mukesh
2. I think Kate looks beautiful!!! Would love to have her long legs. While I think she has a thicker midsection than most swimsuit models I do love that they put her on the SI cover. Why does every model have to have the same body type - big boobs, tiny waist, hips, etc? I really appreciate that she looks very healthy weight-wise but is still very slender. I'm 5'5", 122 lbs, with the same thick midsection. If I lose weight, I also lose from my hips and lose my face padding and start to look too thin. We have to move away from the emaciated, super skinny models. Look at pictures of some of the most famous models from the late 80s to early 90s - Cindy Crawford, Karen Mulder, Helena Christensen, Naomi Campbell, etc., - they were NOT as skinny as today's model's. We have grown do used to seeing such skinny men and women in magazines, tv., etc., that we
Posted at 2:25AM on Mar 7th 2012 by Liz
3. She's very fit but I think there are some unflattering pictures in this gallery. It's nice to see a model have a fit body and flat stomach without be chiseled like most models or bony with eating disorders (where the elbow and knee joints are bigger than the arms and legs themselves - or the typical tall-tell signs of eating disorders where the head looks so huge - big for the body). However, I do say that the gal is no really the standard of beauty that women should be portrayed as. For example...where is her waist? She has close to no waist - like the midsection of a man. One thing that would have made her 10x's better is if the tops had fit her buxom busom. If any other woman followed this as a trend she would ripped to shreds and picked apart for the lack of style to encumber the body properly. I'm just saying.....
Posted at 2:49PM on Feb 22nd 2012 by No Hater
4. Her face is very beautiful, but her mid section is very big.
Posted at 3:01AM on Feb 15th 2012 by Sonia Martinez
5. It shall be as the days of Noah when women were all beautiful and tempted good men with their beauty. Ge 6:2 That the church men saw the daughters of men that they were fair and they took them wives of all which they chose. Mt 24:37 But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
Posted at 7:55PM on Feb 14th 2012 by DR-LOVE
6. SHE HAS NO WAIST
Posted at 7:35PM on Feb 14th 2012 by J M ARNET
7. JEALOUS LADIES, ITS SO OBVIOUS SHE LOOKS TERRIFIC !
Posted at 6:53PM on Feb 14th 2012 by steve
8. Ok, beautiful girl but am I seeing things or do her boobs not match. They should look the same right? But they don't in a number of the shots.
Posted at 3:36AM on Feb 14th 2012 by Wilma
9. ok for supermodel standards or SI i think shes lacking i bit. im sure most would kill for her body but at this level i think shes kinda wide on her mid section if im allowed to say that. and they need to give her tops that fit her. looks much better when they do...
Posted at 1:43AM on Feb 14th 2012 by azs9210